Taxes on tobacco products

Missouri voters will see suggestion tax on tobacco products and give the police department in St. Louis to the local authorities in November, but they will not vote for a payday loan or regulation of minimum wage increases, the Secretary of State Robin Carnahan announced Tuesday.

The payday loan initiative fell 270 signatures less than the number required in the first Congressional District, according to figures released by Carnahan’s office. The minimum wage proposal was 510 signatures short in the third district and 1091 in the first short.

The proposal taxes on tobacco will add 73 cents per pack of cigarettes, 25 percent to the cost of loose tobacco for cigarettes and 15 percent on all other tobacco products. Funds received by an estimated $ 283 million $ 423 million per year will be divided between the public schools, higher education and eradication programs of smoking.

Measure of St. Louis will be canceled during the civil war, a law that puts the police under the supervision of the Board of Police Commissioners, appointed by the Governor.

Decision Tuesday petition is unlikely to provide a new round of litigation. Voting language written by Carnahan and State Auditor Tom Schweich was approved last week the Supreme Court of Missouri tobacco tax, payday loan, and the minimum wage proposals.

Payday loan and the minimum wage initiatives have been undertaken as a coordinated campaign for the measures of community coalitions, faith, labor and student groups, said Sean Soendker Nicholson, director of the Progress of Missouri. They intend to go to court to get another look at the signatures submitted in St. Louis, where only 49 percent of the signatures collected were counted, he said.

According to Nicholson said, came from a post Carnahan, 76 percent of the signatures collected in Boone County were valid and 80 percent of the signatures collected in Jefferson County were valid.

Jefferson County is part of the third electoral district, where the minimum wage proposal fell 510 signatures short. “We are going to fight in court to verify that the signatures are valid,” Nicholson said. The payday loan proposal would cap interest on the short-term loans at 36 percent. The minimum wage proposal would increase the wage to $8.25 an hour and require an annual adjustment based on price levels.

California's tobacco tax

A few weeks after conceding defeat in the June 5 major supporters of the initiative of raising taxes on tobacco to fund cancer research have asked for a recount of votes in some areas of Los Angeles.

Proposition 29 lost 50.3 percent to 49.7 percent – a margin of just 29,565 votes out of more than 5 million cast state – according to unofficial results posted by the office secretary of state. Supporters of the measures found June 22, stating that the gap is too large to overcome as the final ballots were counted.

But to tell it was suggested in some parts of Los Angeles County on Monday deadline for such a request, Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk Dean Logan confirmed on Thursday. Logan says the 191 sites were selected for counting of votes of supporters.

The request was filed by John Maa, in accordance with the Secretary of State office. A doctor by that name, who is a member of the American Heart Association Western States Affiliate, has been featured in press releases and advertisements yes 29. Attorney filter, Bradley W. Hertz in the San Francisco law firm of Sutton, was not immediately available for comment.

Formally, the proposal 29 campaign denied any involvement in the recount. Official Representative Tim Douglass wrote in an email that “no one with any official connection to the campaign with such a request.”

Logan says his department will begin the process of telling the following Monday, the counting of ballots electronically before hand the number of mid-week. He said he expects the recount, which may take more than a week, will cost about $ 5,700 a day. The campaign asked to tell what has to cover the amount of daily deposits, although the taxpayers pick up the tab if the process of changing the election results.

Selected areas were about 48,000 of about 900,000 votes cast for and against the measure in the country. The campaign can add more sites, or pull the plug on the process at any time, Logan said.

Proposition 29 would increase the cigarette tax by $ 1 a pack to pay for cancer research and smoking cessation programs. It was organized by the American Cancer Society, American Heart Association and American Lung Association.

The opposition campaign running on tens of millions of dollars from tobacco companies argue that the income can be put to better use and control panel is created; this measure lacks accountability and creates more bureaucracy.

Caution of tobacco tax in California

Over the past few years, in favor of higher taxes on the sin of trying to appease the Idaho Legislature increased the tax on cigarettes, arguing that such growth is wildly popular among the electorate. This is a trick that the American Cancer Society tried to legislative last winter.

Voters in California, of all places, rejected the proposal 29, which would raise the cigarette tax to the state of 115%. Slightly more than half of California voters oppose the idea, even if the tax increase by $ 1.87 per pack was exposed to the benefit of income that would funnel as much as $ 735 million cancer research, smoking cessation programs and law enforcement agencies.

The defeat is even more amazing when you consider the election in March, which showed that a qualified majority of California voters were willing to cast their “yes” vote for Prop 29.

Part of this stems from the fact that it is very easy to make a pro-tax increase poll, where voters are asked, “How would you like to raise taxes on the (insert name of someone else here) to solve the problems of this list?”

The result is almost amazing glowing. Most people do not smoke, so a tax increase, which appears to me the benefit at the expense of everyone else, seems to be easy to win.

But Californians were some clarity of mind on the subject: Yes, a tax increase will cause a lot of money but the money just to find its way into one or more government bureaucracy.

Cancer research is enormous, with the federal government spending as much as $ 6 billion a year on such programs. Smoking cessation programs already in place, with millions going to them.

And smokers are smart. Did not they just go somewhere to smoke, where taxes are lower or nonexistent? They are, and what they do.

And really, what is the promise of barrels of money to service a wide range of good deeds? Mostly smoke, as evidenced by recent research on the subject.

In 2009 the federal government increased excise taxes on smoking in order to finance the expansion of State Children’s Health Insurance Program. But the responsibility of the U.S. government has shown that raising taxes does not give the money was to be expected. This means that the costs of such programs are transferred to other taxpayers.

In case the federal government budget deficit would balloon, the shift to the children and grandchildren of the taxpayers.

Here in Idaho, even politicians who favor higher taxes on tobacco products, face the same questions California voters staged, and very few answers.

The main reason for any tax on income is for certain public purposes. Proponents of higher taxes on cigarettes just can not give a good story that additional funds will be used. Each person knows that the money will be used for government growing and nobody can guarantee that the revenues derived from tax increase that can lead and actually maintaining tax bureaucracy.

Even worse is that the tax will lead to fewer jobs, and Idaho, there is little effect of consumption of smokers are finding ways to avoid higher tax rates. California voters have realized this, and the vote should make Idaho lawmakers want to run as far as possible from the tobacco tax increase.

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax

In the 2011 annual report of the U.S. Department of Treasury Alcohol and Tobacco Taxes and Trade Bureau (TTB) published earlier this year, emphasizes the many benefits achieved by the new resolution on the website of the Bureau of the system, based on the technology of e-government solutions leader Accela, Inc a full report, available on, details of how the new system allowed TTB to cost-effectively fulfill their mandates – in spite of the reduction of staff and high rates of alcohol beverage producer and wholesaler permit application.

With approximately 500 employees, TTB is responsible for providing and administering laws relating to the manufacture, distribution or use of alcohol and tobacco products. Alcohol-related companies wishing to work on the retail trade must apply with the Cincinnati-based National Center TTB revenue (NRC), which was the main beneficiary of the permit system on the site. TTB also issues permits for tobacco manufacturers, importers and export warehouses, while the firearms and ammunition companies also need to be registered before the TTB duty-free sales.

According to the TTB 2011 Annual Report, the load of processing permits increased by 56 percent to run the system, and the bureau began to assess the 90-day turnover time for the initial application, the resolution by the end of fiscal 2011, compared to 65 days in fiscal year 2010, if the main steps were taken.

The transition from paper-degree system, TTB last year deployed Accela Automation (R) enterprise software as a basis for resolution of the Internet, combined with the use of satellite Accela Citizen Access (TM) online application portal. Significant features of the system include online self-registration, self-control application state, and electronically managed care in the application process. Built-in self-help tips and instructions on every step of the application process also ensure that applications achieve TTB specialists completed correctly and contain all the necessary documents.

According to the 2011 Annual Report, the impact of the first two releases, permissions on the site are substantial. The annual report noted that strategic investments in the TTB permit on the site is crucial to improve the performance for a program that performs an important role in protecting consumer rights and to support economic recovery. “Do not act on the delay in issuing a permit would put TTB in an anti-business posture at a time when job creation and competitiveness of the United States abroad, the National Priorities” report read. “New business is allowed TTB mostly small businesses [that] contribute to jobs at the local level and improve the competitiveness of America in the global market.”

Accela CEO and President Maury Blackman praised the results in the TTB. “Federal agencies like TTB to perform vital functions that benefit consumers and the economy,” said, Blackman. “We are proud to Accela advanced technology – with great success using hundreds of state and municipal institutions -. Help TTB more effectively carry out their important mission,”

Accela permitting Internet-based system was deployed with the assistance of the Federal ePermits, a joint venture between Washington TechGlobal, Inc and Peak Technology Solutions, Inc Thanks to its exceptional work on the draft resolutions on the website of the Federal Department of ePermits received from the Treasury, “Small Business Prime Contractor” for 2011 year.

About TTB headquarters in Washington, TTB operates major facilities in Ohio (NRC), Maryland, and California. TTB also supports substantial mobile workers across the country. TTB’s mission is to collect federal taxes on alcohol, tobacco, weapons, ammunition and food and to protect consumers from unsafe alcohol or improperly labeled products. In addition, the role of TTB in the permitting and regulating alcohol and tobacco industry provides a fair market, expanding trade opportunities and equal conditions for the legitimate industry. For more information on TTB services can be found at:

About Accela Accela, Inc is a leading supplier of mobile, web and cloud applications, making government easier, faster and more accessible to local, state and federal agencies, employees and the citizens they serve. Flagship product, Accela Automation, deploy hundreds of governments of all sizes, as an integrated solution for automating critical tasks associated with permitting, licensing, code enforcement, community development and planning, inspections and investigations, management of infrastructure assets, emergencies, and much more. Accela is headquartered in San Ramon, California with international offices in Australia and the United Arab Emirates. Further information can be found at:

Accela and Accela Automation, and are registered trademarks and Accela access of citizens is a registered trademark of Accela, Inc Other names may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.

California tobacco tax

Supporters of tobacco tax initiative said on Wednesday they were willing to wait a few days if not weeks, to see if the myriad voting turn the tide in their favor.

Proposition 29, which would hike the state cigarette tax by $ 1 per pack, followed by 63,176 votes after election officials counted 3.8 million ballots from Tuesday’s election – 50.8 percent to 49.2 percent margin.

District officials are left to consider the hundreds of thousands of votes cast by the majority of last-minute voters who are constantly using email newsletters. It was not immediately certain number of ballots left, but nine of the most densely populated districts in the state reported almost 800,000 in the combined count.

Neither side was ready to declare race over the environment, although opponents of the initiative was sure that at the last minute voters landed in his corner. They relied on nearly $ 47 million war chest, mainly from the tobacco industry to bring down with the support of 67 percent high in March.

After a night of little sleep, both sides called the county elections office in California to estimate how many ballots were considered mail – and where. Places may be most relevant for the parties consider race over and wait for more ballots to count, as some large districts overwhelmingly swung to one side or the other on Tuesday.

“We are very encouraged with the 63,000-vote lead, but clearly, the ballots are still to be counted,” said the 29 did not spokeswomen Beth Miller. “We are waiting to get a more accurate estimate of how many ballots are still bright and appreciate that there will be consequences.”

Chris Lehmann, head of the Campaign for so sides 29, acknowledged that supporters have an uphill battle if they want to still win the competition. “This campaign was a coalition of cancer survivors and their families, and they do not get used to long odds. They will vigilantly monitor these returns come in and hope for the best.”

Public Policy Institute of California poll showed that 67 percent of voters supported the proposal of March 29, when they read the ballot language. But this figure has been steadily declining through Election Day. The parties combined to spend about $ 60 million in race, with the tobacco industry opposition to the fuel increase of nearly $ 47 million in it.

Lehman said: “The $ 47 million, distortion of truth, as a rule, have an effect on people.”

But opponents said the initiative was flawed, striking a chord with voters, and some editors, who were concerned about how tax revenues are spent. Proposition 29 would raise $ 735 million a year to pay primarily for cancer research and smoking cessation programs. Supporters also emphasized the fact that higher taxes on cigarettes will reduce smoking.

Opponents of the spending plan compared to the previous two voter approved programs for stem cell research and high-speed rail and wondered why this measure will raise money for the state budget.

A new bill introduced by the tobacco tax

A new wrinkle appeared due to the tobacco tax scandal in Randolph County, with an open set of hearings on Tuesday in Montgomery, the second version of the bill address the allocation of funds from taxes on tobacco in Randolph County. This, like the one that has passed legislation only to be vetoed by Governor Robert Bentley, has been declared as required by law.

Georgia Arrington, local official committee of the legislation, said the interested parties on Friday morning that a public hearing on the new bill will be held on Tuesday, May 8 at 10:00 in room 622 at the Statehouse Alabama.

 It will be for the newly introduced bill, HB785, by Rep. Richard Laird, (D-Roanoke). Laird did not respond to repeated phone calls Friday. The bill was the same as the governor vetoed, but with a different formula for the distribution of funds.

Governor Robert Bentley vetoed all three local unpopular bills relating to the distribution of tobacco taxes in Randolph, Chambers and Clay County on Thursday. The bills were designed Sen. Gerald Dial, R-Lineville, and touted Congressman Laird and the Republic of DuWayne Bridges, R-Valley.

A spokesman from the governor, Jeremy King, said: “There were discrepancies between what is published about these accounts and the essence of what actually took place. Governor Bentley has been concern about the discrepancies and vetoed the bills.”

Senator set, in between meetings on Friday, questioned whether the governor vetoed the bill. “I met with the Governor today at 11:30. He said that he would not veto them. I have not heard anything else from him. He’s a good man, Christian, Sunday school teacher, and he said to the 30 school children, Richard and I, he did not veto them, “Dial said.

“I think someone in the governor’s office made a mistake,” Dial said. He said that the decision on Tuesday, when he returned to Montgomery. In response, King said that the veto was not a mistake, and the governor’s office expects that the veto will stand.

The senator said that his priority is set now works for the redistribution of the special session, which is set for 14-18 May. He is chairman of the committee, and there are many details to work, he said. According to the group against the bill, Rep. Laird HB-785 is worse than a bill that was vetoed.

Randolph County bipartisan coalitions, and institutions and organizations against the bill referred to call themselves, according to a press release that they predicted the senator and congressman set Laird will not give up his $ 750,000 “slush fund” without a fight – even after the governor’s veto Bentley.

The coalition immediately asked for a public hearing on the new bill, which was granted a house of local legislation, Deputy Chairman of the committee, Rep. Alan Baker (R-Brewton). Coalition members said they were “very much appreciates the Governor Robert Bentley, recognizing that the Dial-Laird account tobacco taxes have been very bad for the citizens of Randolph and neighboring countries and the entire state of Alabama.

“The fact that the Governor listened to the Bentley people, when our local legislators have refused to do so, certainly helped to restore our faith that the government should be for the people and the people,” said Todd Freeman and David Meddick, chairmen of the Republican Party of Randolph County and Randolph County Democratic Party, in a rare joint statement.

Randolph County Republican and Democratic party chairs are among those who opposed the reallocation of these tobacco tax bills that will take cash and local control of local agencies at the present time they are received and put money in the fund, a grant under the exclusive control of and Unregulated set, Laird, and bridges.

Local attorney Kesa Johnston Dunn, who takes an active part in opposing the changes, elevated, although she warns it is not yet finished. She notes that a simple majority of the legislative veto can overcome the governor, and she doubts the motivation of the introduction of even more stringent version of the bill after the first was vetoed.

She urged people to the governor know that they appreciate his courage in vetoing the bill, and thank him. Call 334-242-7100 for the governor and ask for Tyler vice component of the service, she said. Freeman said he was pleased that the Governor listened to what people are saying when they could not get the “audience” with lawmakers.

SB486, a bill that was vetoed, called for the elimination of funding currently going to the water Randolph County, sewer and power to fire safety, reduced to 24 percent of the amount will be Randolph County Industrial Development Board for the job no more than 20 percent may be for personnel costs, and using 10 percent of the total tobacco tax to create a government grant under the exclusive control of recruitment and Laird, even if the bill, which has been declared the leader Randolph called for the Office of Community Service District, and grant of power, which appeared in the final account.

HB785, the bill introduces Laird after the Governor’s veto, as well as calls for a Community Service Office area, and also eliminates funding for the water district office. Instead of 24 percent of the total going to the industrial development board, however, Bill Laird reduces this to 15 percent, and specify no more than 20 percent may be used for staff costs. 10 percent of the grant for the newly established government / district office is now dead, SB486 increases to 19 percent in Laird HB785.

(Bridges is part of the chambers.) Set, which the majority whips in the Senate, does not have these countries, as well as part or all of Cherokee, Cleburne and Lee counties. Against Randolph County Randolph County bills the Democratic and Republican parties, Randolph County Chamber of Commerce, Randolph County Economic Development Authority and the Water Randolph County, sanitation and fire protection authorities.

Roll-your own tobacco shop owners like the expense of broadening the tax

Customer’s tobacco Mizer save the equivalent of $ 30 carton of cigarettes, tobacco free buying and hollow tube, and then rent a car that rolls his cigarettes.
“Each client has its own mix,” said Bob Mizer, owner of the store. “We have eight different types of tobacco here, and they can mix and blend to meet what they want.”
Ready-made cigarettes are cheap because they are not subject to the same state and federal taxes, as well as with companies that are considered producers in accordance with the laws of the State of Arizona.
Mizer said that this setup allows its operation and others like it to compete with the tobacco store Indian reservations, where customers pay less excise taxes.
That’s why Mizer and others roll their own store to say a bill moving the state legislature would be a mortal blow.
HB 2717, authored by Rep. Jim Weiers, R-Phoenix, would be classified as an enterprise with a cigarette in the mills as producers and subject them to the same regulations and taxes are the companies that make finished cigarettes.
House Commerce Committee approved the bill Feb. 15 to 5.3 votes, sending it to the full house in the form of the Rules Committee.
Mizer said the loss of tax benefits would be only part of the problem, if the bill becomes law.
If he had been classified as a producer, he will be obliged to obtain a state license production. However, those seeking a state license must first obtain a federal license to manufacture, and with that comes a ban on selling directly to customers in the area where they produce cigarettes.
Mizer said that they have no choice but to denial of his three rolling machines, which together cost him about $ 100,000. And because his business depends heavily on them, he said that the need to close and put his 13 employees out of work.
“It’s like a Catch-22,” said Mizer. “You say that we are manufacturers, but we can not obtain a license. We’re going out of business if this bill passes.”
This is not the first attempt to classify the retail roll your own car manufacturers. In 2010, the U.S. Department of Treasury Alcohol and tobacco tax and trade bureau issued a decree calling, but a federal court in Ohio granted the injunction in response to a lawsuit RYO Machine Rental LLC, which sells and rents out a roll of their own machines.
Jeffrey Burd, a lawyer representing the Ohio RYO Machine Rental, told lawmakers that he found the time this bill strange, given that a hearing on the suit of his company is scheduled for April.
Machines used a roll your own tobacco shops are not comparable with the machines used in major cigarette manufacturers, Burd, adding that it would take tobacco stores 16 hours of the camp to as many cigarettes as the car manufacturer is in a minute.
“It’s just a situation where the cigarette manufacturers would like to take comfort from the” add your own “clients, because they prefer that their product was purchased,” said Byrd.
John Mangum, a lawyer representing Altria Group, formerly known as Philip Morris Company Inc, which manufactures cigarettes under brands including Marlboro, told the committee that without the law customers migrate to stores such as in the Mizer. This would reduce the revenue of $ 1.01 per pack federal tax producers and $ 2 for the tax status of the package manufacturer, he said.
Parts and taxes will be spent on anti-smoking programs.
“It is not clear tax advantages”, Mangum said. “What we’re trying to do is to restore what we would call a level playing field.”
Byrd said the machine shop of tobacco does not cause people to roll their own cigarettes, but this is only for the convenience of people who have been rolling their own cigarettes for less efficient cars at home.
“There is no tax loophole,” he said.
Groups joining Altria Group in support of the signing of the bill include Reynolds American Inc, Arizona retail cigar associations and associations of America.
Groups joining RYO rental Car Company and owners of shops, including Mizer, in opposing the bill included Goldwater Institute, an independent watchdog group that promotes limited government and free enterprise.
In voting for the bill, Weiers said the issue boils down to making sure that no business has an unfair advantage when it comes to taxes.
“This is a very touchy issue with me because it goes to the very nerve that I believe that when it comes to taxes and how stupid people are” Weiers said.
Reps. Rick Gray, R-Sun City, Bob Robson, R-Chandler, and JD Mesnard, R-Chandler, voted against the bill.
“If I go out and rent all the equipment necessary to do landscaping, it makes me landscaper? All this really makes sense,” said Robson.

Knight to challenge prison tobacco tax

Mass murderer Julian Knight has been given court approval to fight for cheaper cigarettes in prison.
Julian Knight applied to the Supreme Court to launch a legal challenge against a prison tobacco levy.
He is arguing the levy, which adds 10 per cent or more to the wholesale price of cigarettes, is unlawful.
The court heard the Department of Justice introduced the levy in 1993 to raise funds for health initiatives and anti-smoking programs, but there is no retail margin on tobacco sold in jails.
Knight is currently serving a minimum of 27 years jail for killing seven people and injurying 19 other in the Hoddle Street massacre in 1987.
As a vexatious litigant, he requires court approval to take any legal action.
Associate Justice Melissa Davy has ruled his case has merit.
It will return to court next year.
By Sarah Farnsworth

COA questions Abra’s use of tobacco excise tax share

The Commission on Audit (COA) has found lapses in the disbursement by Abra province of its share from the tobacco excise tax, noting, among others, that tobacco farmers’ groups were not given priority in the use of the fund.
The COA said P3 million from the tobacco excise tax was intended for financial assistance to Abra farmers in 2010. Of this amount, P2.7 million was distributed to various groups.
Abra has 43 registered tobacco farmers; organizations, but only two beneficiaries of the financial assistance were registered as tobacco farmers’ groups. Under the law, these registered groups should have been the fund’s primary beneficiaries, the COA said.
The province’s share from the excise tax is meant to help farmers in tobacco-producing provinces to become more self-reliant, as provided for under Republic Act No. 7171.
“Since RA 7171 was enacted purposely to advance the self-reliance of the tobacco farmers, these tobacco farmer’s organizations should have been given priority in the utilization of the fund,” the COA said.
It also questioned the legality and propriety of transactions funded by Abra’s share from the tobacco excise tax since the implementation of projects did not conform with the rules.
It said projects were not supported by proper documentation. For instance, P17.2 million worth of projects funded by the tobacco tax had no attached list of beneficiaries signed by the recipients of the projects.
The projects involved the procurement of water pumps, construction materials, fertilizer, hand tractors and sprayers.
“As a result, we were not able to confirm receipt of items reportedly distributed to tobacco farmers and whether the objectives of RA 7171 have been attained,” it said.
The COA further said that the purpose of the P1.98 million worth of cement and construction materials purchased was not even indicated. There was also no program of work and approved budget of the contract.
“The absence of indicated purpose hampered further verification and possible validation of its implementation,” it said.
The province failed to maintain a special account and separate depository account for its share from the tobacco excise tax, as required under the law, according to the COA.
Because of this, access to financial information and effective monitoring of the implementation of the fund’s purpose was difficult, it said.
“The creation of such special account solely for the share from tobacco excise tax will provide easier access to financial information to facilitate faster and more effective monitoring of the status of implementation and utilization of such fund,” it said.
Under RA 7171, tobacco-producing provinces get 15 percent of the excise taxes on locally manufactured Virginia-type cigarettes.
By Leila B. Salaverria